カブト虫の森|長崎県 時津町|山之内豪樹のブログ

カブト虫の森|長崎県時津町西時津郷にある昆虫ショップの代表のブログ

*

Refugee Agreement Deutsch

   

The protection of asylum is the responsibility of states, although it is generally implemented by municipalities within territorial states. The situation in 2015 showed that there are large discrepancies, both between federal funding and costs borne by states, and between costs borne by municipalities and reimbursements they receive from their states (this mechanism only applies to territorial states). In 2015, Hamburg spent €586.2 million on hosting refugees; only €50 million has been repaid by the German government this year. However, the federal government has compensated states retroactively (see list below), which eases the financial burden on state budgets. The following table provides an overview of the costs of benefits for refugees in Hamburg in 2015. This research mission illustrated the wide range of roles that city-states and cities play in responding to the refugee crisis. Public, private and civil society leaders and institutions, as well as ordinary citizens, deserve to be commended for the dedication of their time and resources and the creativity of their actions. The Convention relating to the Status of Refugees is based on Article 14 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which recognizes the right of individuals to seek asylum from persecution in other countries. A refugee may enjoy rights and benefits in a State in addition to the rights and benefits provided for in the Convention. [3] The issue of cost allocation is complicated and evolving. The federal government began negotiations with the federal states on the high costs of managing the refugee crisis.27 In July 2016, it was agreed that the federal government would reimburse the Länder for the costs of hosting and integrating refugees – until now only the responsibility of states and municipalities.

Payments consist of the following elements: the European Council and Turkey reached an agreement in March 2016 to reduce the flow of irregular migrants to Europe via Turkey. According to the EU-Turkey statement, all new irregular migrants and asylum seekers arriving on the Greek islands from Turkey whose asylum applications have been declared inadmissible should be returned to Turkey. In addition, for every Syrian returned to Turkey, another Syrian is expected to be resettled in the EU in exchange for further visa liberalisation for Turkish citizens and the payment of €6 billion under the Facility for Refugees in Turkey by the end of 2018. According to the Commission`s latest progress report on the implementation of the European Agenda on Migration of 16 October 2019, the Declaration continued to play a key role in ensuring that the challenge of migration in the Eastern Mediterranean is effectively addressed. However, the report highlights that Turkey is now facing increasing migratory pressures as instability persists in the region, and that EU assistance through the €6 billion Facility for Refugees in Turkey provides vital support to those in need. In February 2020, Turkey threatened to suspend the declaration, which had repercussions in Greece, which suspended asylum rights and blocked large numbers of migrants at its borders, in addition to reported pushbacks in the Aegean Sea. In March 2020, Turkey suspended the readmission of returnees from the Greek islands due to the pandemic, and the EU is currently trying to persuade Turkey to resume readmission at the highest political level. According to the United Nations, Turkey has taken in 2,900,000 refugees. However, Turkey claims that its number has recently increased to around 3,500,000. The EU`s objective is to develop a common policy on asylum, subsidiary protection and temporary protection in order to grant adequate status to all third-country nationals in need of international protection and to ensure that the principle of non-refoulement is respected. This policy must be in accordance with the Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951 and the Protocol thereto of 31 January 1967.

Neither the TFEU nor the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union contains a definition of `asylum` or `refugee`, but both refer explicitly to the Geneva Convention and its Protocol. The EU has begun the resettlement of refugees and other migrants from Greece to Turkey and the relocation of Syrians from Turkey to the bloc. It is time to involve cities as full participants and partners in helping refugees. Leaders from the public, private and civil society sectors in municipalities across Germany and Europe have been at the forefront of welcoming and integrating refugees. In the face of these major challenges, they are inventing new ways to provide the services newcomers need to be healthy and productive members of their new countries. Now Turkey needs to ask itself a question about the deal, Nas says: “What should the future of the Syrians look like?” There is not much difference between refugees and asylum rights. The two forms of protection are essentially based on different legal bases. The protection of refugees is enshrined in the 1951 Geneva Convention on Refugees and the 1967 Protocol; the protection of persons entitled to asylum is defined in the Basic Law. But the reasons for this recognition are essentially the same.

As in the right of asylum, you cannot be recognised as a refugee if there is a safe area in your country of origin where you can seek safety and secure your livelihood. The federal quota system for the distribution of refugees in German countries is fair, equitable and effective, as it allocates refugees according to a long-standing formula for the distribution of federal funds. The main financial instrument of the EU budget in the field of asylum is the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF). The AMIF allocation in the previous long-term EU budget (2014-2020), which coincided with the migration crisis, increased from €3.31 billion to €6.6 billion. For the current long-term EU budget for the period 2021-2027, the AMIF has again been increased to €9.9 billion, in particular to effectively and humanely manage migration, asylum and integration, including Member States` financial support for solidarity solidarity through resettlement and resettlement. .

The following two tabs change content below.
アバター画像
1962年 福岡県飯塚市生まれ 育ちは兵庫県尼崎市。ファーストフードで会社員をしながら、長崎県時津町で! 昆虫専門店 ❝カブト虫の森❞ 代表をこなしつつ、イオン同友店会で役員も兼務中!! 3役をこなしながら営業中です!  カブト虫・クワガタ虫に興味を持った? 持っている? お客様に昆虫の神秘を少しでも伝えれる店舗を目指しています。 また、お子様が興味を持って困っているお父さん・お母さんの手助けもおまかせください!!
アバター画像

最新記事 by kabumori@yamanouchi (全て見る)

 - 未分類